An Analysis of the Wool Characteristics That Determine the Wool Price for White Wool in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2024/v52n1a14907Keywords:
Clean yield, Fibre diameter, Staple length, Vegetable Matter, Staple LengthAbstract
This study evaluates the effects of white wool's characteristics (fibre diameter/fineness, staple strength, vegetable matter, and staple length) that contribute to determining the wool price in South Africa. The analysis was based on wool price data for the 2009 to 2019 production seasons. A multiple regression analysis of the price (R/kg) of White wool was applied to four independent variables: fibre diameter/fineness, staple strength, vegetable matter and staple length. Fibre diameter, staple length and clean yield, except vegetable matter, made a significant contribution (p < 0.05) to the determination of wool price after all other independent variables were controlled. A one-unit increase in staple length was associated with a 0.018-unit increase in wool price (R/kg). One unit (micron) increase in fibre diameter/fineness resulted in a 0.331 unit decrease in wool price (R/kg). One unit (percentage) increase in clean yield resulted in a 0.115 unit increase in wool price (R/kg). The analysis found that a 1% increase in clean yield, a measure of the amount of clean, usable wool produced by a sheep, was associated with an average increase of 0.115 R/kg in the price of wool. This means that as clean yield increases, wool price tends to increase. Clean yield varies within sheep flocks due to varying amounts of wax and contaminants such as vegetable matter dirt, breed of sheep, and the environmental conditions during wool growth. There was no statistically significant association between vegetable matter and wool price. Wool farmers need to produce wool with low fibre diameter, good length of wool and high clean yield percentage for White wool. Additionally, farmers should focus on improving their production and marketing practices, and policymakers should consider implementing policies that support the wool industry and increase its competitiveness.
Downloads
Metrics
References
AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL [ARC]., 2018. Economic outlook report XXIII. Economic Analysis Unit. Agricultural Economics and Capacity Development Division.
AUSTRALIAN WOOL INNOVATION LIMITED., 2016. The sheeps back. Shearing more than once a year. Is it worth it?
BOTHA, A.F. & HUNTER, L., 2010. The measurement of wool fibre properties and their effect on worsted processing performance and product quality. Part 1. The objective measurement of wool fibre properties. Textile Progress, 42(4): 227-339.
CAPE WOOLS, SA., 2002. Classing standards. Available from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nwga.co.za/file/5ac4988518ed1/classeng2rotate.pdf
CAPE WOOLS, SA., 2010. Code of Practice for clip preparation. Available from https://www.capewools.co.za/view-pdf/17/1/cape-wools-code-of-best-practice#PDF/2-3
CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT [CDS]., 2005. Assisting poor wool producers to access the international wool market: Success and stumbling blocks. Bloemfontein, University of the Free State: CDS Research Report, LED and SMME Development.
CHETENI, P. & MOKHELE, X., 2019. Small-scale livestock farmers' participation markets: Evidence from the land reform beneficiaries in the Central Karoo, Western Cape, South Africa. South African Journal of Agriculture Extension, 47(1): 118-136.
CONRADIE, B., 2019. Designing successful land reform for the extensive grazing sector. South African Journal of Agriculture Extension, 47(2): 1-12.
COTTLE, D. J. & BAXTER, B. P., 2015. Wool metrology research and development to date. Textile Progress, 47(3): 163-315.
DE BEER, L. & TERRBLANCHE, S. E., 2015. Improving the livelihoods of wool producers in a sustainable manner by optimizing the woolled sheep production systems within the communal farming area of the Eastern Cape. A vision that is future-directed. South African Journal of Agriculture Extension, 43(2): 105-122.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FISHERIES AND FORESTRY [DAFF]., 2021. Trends in the Agricultural Sector. Republic of South Africa.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FISHERIES AND FORESTRY [DAFF]., 2010. Agricultural marketing policy for the Republic of South Africa.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FISHERIES AND FORESTRY [DAFF]., 2016. A profile of the South African wool market value chain.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FISHERIES & FORESTRY [DAFF]., 2017. Trends in the Agricultural Sector. The Republic of South Africa.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FISHERIES & FORESTRY. (DAFF, 2020). Trends in the Agricultural Sector Republic of South Africa. Acadia. Pretoria.
D’HAESE, M., CALUS, M., KIRSTEN, J.F., VAN HYLENBROECK, G. & BOSTYN, F., 2001. Efficiency analysis of small-scale wool production in the former Transkei South Africa. Agrekon., 40(4): 641-655.
D’HAESE, M., VINK, N., VAN HUYLENBROECK, K.G., BOYSTYN, F. & KIRSTEN, J., 2003. Local institution innovation and pro-poor agricultural growth: The case study of small wool grower's associations in South Africa. Belgium: Garant Publishers.
DLODLO, N. & CELE, C., 2010. Building towards an expert system to predict greasy wool to top characteristics. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science, 58.1(3): 38-50.
DOYLE, E. K., PRESTON, J.W.V., MCGREGOR, B.A. & HYND, P.I., 2021. The science behind the wool industry. The importance and value of wool production from sheep. Animal Frontiers., 11(2): 15-23.
ERASMUS, G.J. & DELPORT, G.J., 1987. Factors influencing the price of greasy fleece wool in South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science, 17(2): 111-115.
FLEMING, E. & COTTLE, D., 2015. Is the Australian wool industry efficient at converting wool into value? Australasian Agribusiness Review, 23(5): 56-82.
FORD, K.L. & COTTLE, D.J., 1993. Wool technology and sheep breeding. A review of the use of sheep goats to improve the processing potential of wool, 41(2): 161-172.
GEYER, A.C., 2013. Merino economics overview for the past decade (2003 – 2013). Merino SA Focus, 2013: 98-99.
GIBBON, C. & NOLAN, E., 2011. The Australian wool industry: A hedonic pricing analysis of the factors affecting the price of Australian wool. Contributed Paper Prepared for presentation at the 55th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, 9-11 February, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
HENDERSON, L., 2015. Shearing intervals with added benefits. Stockfarm, 5(7): 12-13.
HUMAN, A., 2018. The ABC of wool processing. Farmlink, 4(7): 46-47.
JACKSON, S., 2012. Research methods and statistics. A critical thinking approach. Wadsworth International edition.
JAIN, S., 2019. Research methodology in Arts, Science and Humanities. Canada: Society Publishing.
KOTHARI, C.M., 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
LIAMPUTTONG, P., 2019. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Penrith, NSW, Australia: Springer..
MEMON, H., WANG, H. & LANGAT, E.K., 2018. Determination and characterization of the wool fibre yield of Kenyan breeds: An economically sustainable practical approach for Kenya. Fibers Journal, 6(55): 1-12.
MOUTON, J. & MARAIS, H.C., 1990. Understanding social research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
NAYAK, J.K. & SINGH (2015). Fundamentals of research methodology: Problems and prospects. New Delhi, India: SSDN Publishers and Distributors.
NOLAN, E., 2012. The economic value of wool attributes. Report prepared for Australian Wool Innovation Limited. Faculty of Agriculture and Environment. The University of Sydney, 1-80.
NOLAN, E., FARREL, T., RYAN, M., GIBBON, C. & AHMADI-ESFAHANI, F.Z., 2013. Valuing quality attributes of Australian Merino wool. Australian Journal of Agricultural and resource economics, (58): 314-335.
NOLAN, E., 2014. The economic value of wool attributes phase 2. Report prepared for Australian Wool Innovation Limited. School of Economics. The University of Sydney.
PALLANT, J., 2016). SPSS. Survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 6th edn. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
PAWSON, E. & PERKINS, E., 2013. Worlds of wool: Recreating value off the sheep's back. New Zealand Geographer, 69: 208-220.
PEPPER, P.M., ROSE, M.D. & MILLS, D.M.D., 2000. Influence of measured characteristics on the price received for Merino wool from the Traprock area of Southern Queensland. In Animal Production for consuming world. AAAP ASAP. Conference, 2-7 July, Sydney, Australia.
SAWYER, G., FOX, D.R. & NARAYAN, E., 2021. Pre- and post-partum variation in wool cortisol and wool micron in Australian Merino ewe sheep (Ovis ories). Peer Journal, 1-17.
SCOBIE, D.R., GROSVENOR, A.J., BRAY, A.R., TANDON, S.K.., MEADE, W.J. & COOPER, A.M.B., 2015. A review of wool fibre variation across the body of sheep and the effects on wool processing. Small Ruminant Research, 133(2015): 43-53.
SCOTT, K. J., 1990). An analysis of premiums for staple measurement and price differentials for length and strength properties of merino combing wool. 34th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, 12-15 February, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-15.
SIMMONS, P., 1980. Determination of grade prices for wool. Reviews of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, 48(1): 37-46.
STOCKEMER, D., 2019. Quantitative methods for the social sciences. A practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
VENTER, C., 2017. How to establish shearing frequencies. Stockfarm., 7(10): 13-15.
ZENDA, M., MALAN, P.J. & GEYER, A., 2023. An analysis of the wool characteristics that determine wool price in South Africa. Res. J. Text. Appar. Available from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RJTA-06-2023-0061/full/pdf?title=an-analysis-of-the-wool-characteristics-that-determine-wool-price-in-south-africa
ZENDA, M., MALAN, P. J. & GEYER, A., 2024. An analysis of the wool characteristics that determine wool price for Merino wool in South Africa. Scientific African., 23: 1-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Zenda, P.J. Malan, A.C. Geyer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}