Is There a Case for Supporting Animal Traction Research, Policy, and Practice in Rural South Africa? - A Review

S. Zantsi; M. Christian

doi:10.17159/2413-3221/2023/v51n1a11284

Authors

S. Zantsi Department of Agricultural Economics
M. Christian Nelson Mandela University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2023/v51n1a11284

Keywords:

Small-scale, Bottom-up approach, Extension, Government, Rural development

Abstract

Appropriate and efficient technology contributes a great deal to smallholder farmer development. This study uses a systematic literature review to debate whether animal traction research and practice should receive support. Firstly, the smallholder farming system is reviewed to contextualise the discussion and present a state-of-the-art review of animal traction in South Africa. After finding the diminishing use of animal traction among smallholder farming systems, the inquiry probes the causes of the rural development policies, basic education curriculum, and higher learning institutions. The results reveal that the technological needs of smallholder farmers can be met with animal traction. However, a lack of support from policies and learning institutions has contributed to the negative attitude toward animal traction. We further note that new animal traction technology is unlikely to be known to smallholders because of poor information dissemination caused by a weak agricultural extension. After realising the benefits of animal traction, it seems worthwhile to revamp animal traction research and practice for subsistence farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACADEMY OF SCIENCE OF SOUTH AFRICA (ASSAF)., 2017. Revitalising agricultural education and training in South Africa. Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2016/0016

BLAKEMAN, K., 2013. Finding research information on the web: How to make the most of Google and other free search tools. Sci. Prog., 96(1): 61-84.

DE LA HEY, M. & BEINART, W., 2016. Why have South African smallholders largely abandoned arable production in fields? A case study. J.South. Afri.Stud., 43(4): 753-770.

DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM (DRDLR)., 2016. One household 1 hectare is putting food in the mouths of the poor. Pretoria, South Africa.

ELLIS, E. & BIGGS, S., 2001. Evolving themes in rural development 1950s-2000s. Dev. Policy Rev., 19(4): 437-448.

FISCHER, K. & HAJDU, F., 2015. Does raising maise yields lead to poverty reduction? A case study of the Massive Food Production Programme in South Africa. Land Use Policy., 46: 304-313.

FIELKE, S., TAYLOR, B. & JAKKU, E., 2020. Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review. Agric. Syst., 180: 102763.

FOWLER, R. 1999., Animal draft power in South Africa: Past, present and future. In P. Starkey, &P. Kaumbutho (eds.), Meeting the challenges of animal traction. A resource book of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA). Harare, Zimbabwe: Intermediate Technology Publications, 326.

JACOBSON, K. 2013., The Massive Food Production programme: A case study of agricultural policy continuities and change. In P. Hebinck, & B. Cousin (Eds.), The Shadow of Policy: Everyday Practices in South Africa, Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 205-2017.

HAJDU, F., NEVES, D. & GRANLUND, S., 2020. Changing livelihoods in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa (2002–2016): Diminishing employment and expanding social protection. J. South. Afr. Stud., 46(4): 743-772.

HART, T., 2011. African vegetables and food security for poor agrarian households in Limpopo Province: Effective but neglected indigenous knowledge under threat. In M. Aliber (ed.), Strategies to support South African smallholders as a contribution to government’s second economy strategy Volume 2: Case studies. Cape Town: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, 163-182.

HAZELL, P.B.R. 2005., Is there a future for small farms? Agric. Econ., 32(S1): 93-101.

HEBINCK, P., FAY, D. & KONDLO, K., 2011. Land and agrarian reform in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province: Caught by continuities. J. Agrar. Chang., 11(2): 220-240.

HULL, E., 2014. The social dynamics of labour shortage in South African small-scale agriculture. World Dev., 59(1): 451-460.

JOUBERT, B., 2016. Why the use of draft animals must start gaining traction-part 2. Farmers Weekly. [Viewed 01 April 2022]. Available from https://journals.co.za/toc/farmweek/2016/16012

KEPE, T. & TESSARO, D., 2014. Trading-off: Rural food security and land rights in South Africa. Land Use Policy., 36: 267-274.

MACHETE, F. & SHALE, K., 2015. Classification of unregulated landfills by waste stream analysis method: A case of Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality, Republic of South Africa. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. , 7(6): 446-452.

MBATA, J.N., 2001. Determinants of animal traction adoption in traditional agriculture: An application of the multivariate probit procedure to the case of Lesotho. Dev. South. Afr., 18(39): 309-325.

MAKAOTA, M. & MOTIANG, D., 2000. The role of animal traction in the Molopo District of the North West Province, South Africa. In P.G. Kaumbutho, R.A. Pearson & T.E. Simalenga (eds.), Empowering Farmers with Animal Traction. Proceedings of the workshop of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), 20-24 September 1999, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 344.

NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE., n.d. Guidelines on animal traction. Pretoria: DoA.

NATIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION (NPC)., 2011. The National Development Plan 2030: Our future-make it work. Pretoria: NPC.

OLOFSSON, M., 2020. Socio-economic differentiation from a class analytic perspective: The case of smallholder tree crop farmers in Limpopo, South Africa. J. Agrar. Chang., 20:37-59.

O'NEILL, D.H., SNEYD, J., MZILENI, N.T., MAPEYI, L., NJEKWA, M. & ISRAEL, S., 1999. The use and management of draught animals by smallholder farmers in the former Ciskei and Transkei. Dev. South. Afr., 16(2): 319-333.

PETTICREW, M. & ROBERTS, H., 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

SANTERAMO, F.G. & LAMONACA, E., 2019. The effects of non-tariff measures on agri-food trade: A review and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. J. Agric. Econ., 70(3): 595-617.

STARKEY, P., 2011. Livestock for traction and transport world trends, key issues and policy implications. AGA Working Paper Series. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).

SIMALENGA, T.E., BELETE, N.A., MZELENI, N.A. & JONGISA, L.L., 2000. Profitability of using animal traction under smallholder farming conditions in Eastern Cape, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Agric. Ext., 29(1): 1-9.

SHACKLETON, S.E. & HEBINCK, P., 2018. Through the ‘thick and thin’ of farming in the Wild Cost South Africa. J. Rural Stud., 61:277-289.

SHETTO R.M., MKOMWA, S. & SIMALENGA, T.E., 2000. Entrepreneurship in animal traction: empowering rural initiatives. In P.G. Kaumbutho, R.A. Pearson & T.E. Simalenga (eds.), Empowering Farmers with Animal Traction. Proceedings of the workshop of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), 20-24 September 1999, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 344.

STARKEY, P., JAIYESIMI-NJOBE, F. & HANEKOM, D., 1995. Animal traction in South Africa: Overview of key issues. In P. Starkey (ed.), Animal traction in South Africa: Empowering rural communities. Gauteng: Halfway House, 17-30.

STARKEY, P. 2000. Empowering farmers with animal traction: Worldwide trends, issues and challenges. In P.G. Kaumbutho, R.A. Pearson & T.E. Simalenga (eds.), Empowering Farmers with Animal Traction. Proceedings of the workshop of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), 20-24 September 1999, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 344.

STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA [StatsSA], 2016., Community survey: Agricultural households. Report 03-01-05. [Viewed 20 January 2021]. Available from: www.statssa.gov.za/publications/03-01- 05/Presentation_CS2016_Agricultural_Households.pdf.

STOOP, W.A. & HART, T., 2005. Research and development towards sustainable agriculture by resource-poor farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some strategic and organisational considerations in linking farmer practical needs with policies and scientific theories. Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 3(3): 206- 2016.

STROEBEL, A., SWANEPOEL, F.J.C. & PELL, A.N., 2011. Sustainable smallholder livestock systems: A case study of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Livest. Sci., 139: 186-90.

SWIEGERS, J., 2000. The use of information technology in animal traction development. In P.G. Kaumbutho, R.A. Pearson & T.E. Simalenga (eds.), Empowering Farmers with Animal Traction. Proceedings of the workshop of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), 20-24 September 1999, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 344.

TAKAHASHI, K., MURAOKA, R. & OTSUKA, K., 2020. Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agric. Econ., 51: 31–45.

TAPELA, B. & ALCOCK, R. 2011. Msinga smallholder irrigation farmers: commercially successful smallholders using mixed technologies. In M. Aliber (ed.), Strategies to support South African smallholders as a contribution to government’s second economy strategy Volume 2: Case studies. Bellville: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, 133-142.

VAN AVERBEKE, W. & KHOSA, T.B., 2011. Smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa with a focus on Dzindi Canal Irrigation Scheme in Limpopo: dynamic smallholders amidst contested policy priorities. In M. Aliber (ed.), Strategies to support South African smallholders as a contribution to government’s second economy strategy Volume 2: Case studies. Bellville: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, 145-161.

WILSON, R.T., 2003. The environmental ecology of oxen used for draught power. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 97: 21-37.

ZHANG, D., XU, J., ZHANG, Y., WANG, J., HE, S. & ZHOU, X., 2020. Study on sustainable urbanisation literature based on Web of Science, Scopus, and China national knowledge infrastructure: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. J. Clean. Prod., 264: 121537.

ZAMCHIYA, P., 2019. Differentiation and development: The case of the Xolobeni community in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Bellville: Institute for Poverty Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape.

ZANTSI, S. & BESTER, B., 2019. Revisiting the benefits of animal traction to subsistence smallholder farmers: a case study of Ndabakazi villages in Butterworth, Eastern Cape province of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Agric. Ext., 47(3): 1-13.