Production Objectives, Selection and Culling Approach of Breeding Stock in Smallholder Goat Farming System in the Sedibeng District, Gauteng Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2025/v53n5a21330Keywords:
Breeding Objectives, Selection Methods, Trait Preferences, Culling CriteriaAbstract
The study evaluated the production objectives, breeding selection, culling practices, and challenges faced by smallholder goat farmers in the Sedibeng district. The study included 56 actively engaged farmers selected through random sampling. Data was collected through a focus group meeting using a predetermined list of variables and Likert scales. An index and mean score were calculated to rank variables, determine the prioritised variables, and identify variables perceived to impact goat production. The study found that the top production objectives were the sale of goats, asset investment, and social/cultural events. Traits such as body size, twinning ability, kidding frequency, mothering ability, and coat colour were key factors in selecting breeding does. In contrast, body size, mating ability, and coat colour were important factors in choosing breeding bucks. Health issues, old age, poor fertility, and body condition were common reasons for culling breeding stock. Major constraints included feed shortages, uncontrolled breeding, disease prevalence, limited veterinary services, slow growth rates, low pregnancy rates, extended kidding intervals, low kidding rates, and high mortality rates among kids. To improve the health and productivity of smallholder goat farming systems, better management practices, access to resources, and appropriate training are essential.
Downloads
References
AGHWAN, Z., ALIMON, A., GOH, Y., NAKYINSIGE, K. & SAZILI A., 2014. Fatty acid profiles of supraspinatus, longissimus lumborum and semitendinosus muscles and serum in Kacang goats supplemented with inorganic selenium and iodine. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci., 27(4): 543–550.
AHLMAN, T., BERGLUND, B., RYDHMER, L. & STRANDBERG, E., 2011. Culling reasons in organic and conventional dairy herds and genotype by environment interaction for longevity. J. Dairy Sci., 94(3): 1568-1575.
CHAUHAN, S., POWAR, P. & MEHRA, R., 2021. A review on nutritional advantages and nutraceutical properties of cow and goat milk. Int. J. Appl. Res., 7(10): 101-105.
COOKE, A.S., MACHEKANO, H., VENTURA-CORDERO, J., LOURO-LOPEZ, A., JOSEPH, V., GWIRIRI, L.C., TAKAHASHI, T., MORGAN, E.R., LEE, M.R.F. & NYAMUKONDIWA, C., 2024. Opportunities to improve goat production and food security in Botswana through forage nutrition and the use of supplemental feeds. Food Sec., 16: 607–622.
DELGADILLO, J.A. & MARTIN, G.B., 2015. Alternative methods for control of reproduction in small ruminants: A focus on the needs of grazing industries, Anim Front., 5(1): 57–65.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (DALRRD)., 2022. A profile of the South African goat market value chain. Available from https:/webapps1.daff.gov.za/
EL-RAGHI, A.A., HASSAN, M.A.E., EL-RATEL, I.T., HASHEM, N.M. & ABDELNOUR, S.A., 2021. Sustainable management of voluntary culling risk in Primiparous Zaraibi goats in Egypt: Roles of season and reproductive and milk production-related traits. Animals., 11(8): 2342.
FORTE, L., DE PALO, P., NATRELLA, G., ALOIA, A. & MAGGIOLINO, A., 2024. Effects of dry and wet ageing on culled goat meat quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 23(1): 693-706.
GETANEH, G., MEBRAT, A., WUBIE, A. & KENDIE, H., 2016. Review on goat milk composition and its nutritive value. J Nutr Health Sci., 3(4): 401.
GITAU, G.M., MAINA, O.I., NYAMBUNE, M.C. & VINCENT, M., 2023. Constraints and opportunities in smallholder dairy goat production systems in the tropics. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 22(2): 83-99.
GIZAW, S., ABEBE, A., GOSHME, S., GETACHEW, T., BISRAT, A., ABEBE, A.M. & BESUFIKAD, S., 2021. Evaluating the accuracy of smallholder farmers’ sire identification for introducing genetic evaluation in community-based sheep breeding programs. Livest. Sci., 255: 104804.
GREYLING, J.P.C., 2000. Reproduction traits in the Boer goat doe. Small Rumin. Res., 36(2): 171-177.
IVANOVIĆ, S., PAVLOVIĆ, I. & PISINO, B., 2016. The quality of goat meat and its impact on Human health. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 32(2): 111-122.
JURY, M.R., 2016. Climate influences on Vaal River flow. Water SA., 42(2): 232.
KOM, Z., NETHENGWE, N.S., MPANDELI, N.S. & CHIKOORE, H., 2022. Determinants of small-scale farmers’ choice and adaptive strategies in response to climatic shocks in Vhembe District, South Africa. GeoJournal., 87: 677–700.
LOHANI, M. & BHANDARI, D., 2021. The importance of goats in the world. Pro. Agric. Workers J., (6)2: 4.
MATAVEIA, G.A., VISSER, C. & SITOE A., 2021. Smallholder goat production in Southern Africa: A review. In S. Kukovics (ed.), Goat Science - Environment, Health and Economy. IntechOpen.
MATHAPO, M.C., TYASI, T.L. & MUGWABANA, T.J., 2025. Breeding objectives and trait preferences of Nguni goat farmers in Limpopo province, South Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod., 57(49): 1-13.
MAYBERRY, D., ASH, A., PRESTWIDGE, D. & HERRERO, M., 2018. Closing yield gaps in smallholder goat production systems in Ethiopia and India. Liv. Sci., 214: 238-244.
MAZHANGARA, I.R., CHIVANDI, E., MUPANGWA, J.F. & MUCHENJE, V., 2019. The potential of goat meat in the red meat industry. Sustainability., 11(13): 3671.
MTSHALI, T.F., MAPHOLI, O.N., NCUBE, K.T., DZOMBA, E.F., MATELELE, T.C., CHOKOE, T.C., MPHAHLELE, T.D., MUCHADEYI, F.C. & HADEBE, K., 2021. Goat farmers’ production objectives and trait preferences in the North West province of South Africa: An approach to identify selection criteria for community-based breeding programs. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 12: 64 - 75.
NAMONJE-KAPEMBWA, T., CHIWAWA, H. & SITKO, N., 2022. Analysis of goat production and marketing among smallholder farmers Zambia. Small Rumin. Res., 208: 106620.
NTSHANGASE, M.Z., SANELISE, T., MOYO, B., MISERY, S. & VAN NIEKERK, J., 2021. Factors affecting household goat farmers’ market participation and the extent of commercialization. In S. Kukovics (ed.), Goat Science - Environment, Health and Economy. IntechOpen.
RAHEEM, K.A., BASIRU, A., RAJI, L.O. & ODETOKUN, I.A., 2024. Chapter 13 – Productive performance of goat. In T. Rana (ed.), Trends in clinical diseases, production and management of goats. Academic Press, pp. 163-177.
RAOSOFT., 2004. Sample size calculator. Available from www.raofoft.com/samplesize.html
SEDIBENG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY (SDM)., 2023. Climate change adaptation plan: DraDraft 1. Green book adapting settlements for the future. Available from https://greenbook.co.za/documents/Sedibeng_AdaptationPlan_Aug2023.pdf
SETOBOLI, T., TSHUMA, N. & SIBANDA, E., 2025. Viability of goat production and market participation: A comparative analysis of smallholder farmers in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res., VIII(XV): 244-251.
SHERIFF, O., ZEWDIE, B. & HAMID, A., 2024. Understanding goat keepers’ breeding objectives and selection criteria in northwestern Ethiopia: Application of participatory own-flock and group-animal ranking experiments. Cogent Food Agric., 10(1): 1-10.
TYASI, T.L., NG’AMBI, J. & MOGASHOA, S., 2022. Breeding practices and trait preferences of goat keepers at Lepelle-Nkumpi Local Municipality, South Africa: Implications for the design of breeding programmes. Trop Anim Health Pro., 54(68): 1- 9.
WEBB, E.C. & MAMABOLO, M.J., 2004. Production and reproduction characteristics of South African indigenous goats in communal farming systems. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 34(1): 236-239.
WEIGEL, K.A., PALMER, R.W. & CARAVIELLO D.Z., 2003. Investigation of factors affecting voluntary and involuntary culling in expanding dairy herds in Wisconsin using survival analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 1482–1486.
YEMANE, G., MELESSE, A. & TAYE, M., 2020. Evaluation of production systems and husbandry practices of Ethiopian indigenous goats. J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(6): 268-277.
YUE, X., ZHANG, T., ZHAO, X., LIU, X. & MA, Y., 2016. Effects of rainfall patterns on annual plants in Horqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Land., 8: 389–398.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 S. Maoba, B. Manyakanyaka, R.M. Chepape

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


.png)